Wetware World

Comparisons

Side-by-side comparisons

Head-to-head comparisons of named suppliers, platforms and models. These are the pages no individual vendor will write, because each one names its competitors. We hold no manufacturing stake in the outcome, which is the only reason we can publish them.

Pages
6
Updated
2026-09-01
Page Type Sources Updated
Organ-on-chip platforms compared: Emulate, MIMETAS, CN Bio and six others

Eight organ-on-chip platforms against throughput, perfusion mechanism, membrane versus scaffold-free architecture, imaging compatibility, open versus closed consumables and published tissue models. No vendor publishes consumable pricing — that column is honestly empty.

Comparison 9 2026-09-01
Organ-on-chip vs Transwell vs static culture: a decision matrix

Three culture architectures compared on physiological relevance, cost per data point, throughput and hands-on time — including an explicit account of when a Transwell insert is the right and cheaper answer, which is more often than the field admits.

Comparison 8 2026-09-01
3D skeletal muscle models compared: device, cell source, force readout and cost per data point

A comparison matrix of 3D skeletal muscle models — Curi Bio Mantarray, eNUVIO OMEGA-MP, Duke myobundles, myriamed myrPlate and myrTissue-Skeletal, and CYTOO MyoScreen — on cell source, device, force readout, maturation time, throughput and cost per data point, with published force figures.

Comparison 9 2026-09-01
3D tissue model suppliers compared: what ships, what is custom, and what it costs

A comparison of fourteen 3D tissue model suppliers — MatTek, EPISKIN, InSphero, MIMETAS, Emulate, CN Bio, TissUse, Altis, Visikol, Xellar, Phenion, J-TEC, myriamed and eNUVIO — on tissue types, format, whether they ship finished tissue or an empty device, custom capability and published price band.

Comparison 17 2026-09-01
EpiDerm vs SkinEthic RHE vs EPiTRI: reconstructed human epidermis compared

A head-to-head of the validated reconstructed human epidermis models — barrier function and ET-50 acceptance ranges, protocol parameters, OECD TG 439 and TG 431 validation status, formats, lead time and what is actually published about price.

Comparison 11 2026-09-01
iPSC neuron suppliers compared, head to head

A genuinely even-handed head-to-head of the main human iPSC-derived neuron suppliers — price per million, purity specification, subtype breadth, line provenance, published electrophysiology, licensing and minimum order — with a clear statement of where each one is strongest.

Comparison 10 2026-09-01

Need the number for your specification

These pages carry published list prices and supplier capabilities. A quotation against your actual specification is a different number, and we will source it.

Request a quote